Background
On August 3, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an opinion and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV). This order vacated, among other provisions, the batching provisions established under the Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II (October 2021 interim final rules) codified at 26 CFR 54.9816-8T(c)(3)(i)(C), 29 CFR 2590.716-8(c)(3)(i)(C), and 45 CFR 149.510(c)(3)(i)(C), which required that items and services batched in one independent dispute resolution (IDR) dispute be billed under the same service code or a comparable code under a different procedural code system.
On September 26, 2023, the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (collectively the “Departments”) published the Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Certified IDR Entity Fee Ranges proposed rule, which stated that since the TMA IV opinion and order vacated 26 CFR 54.9816-8T(c)(3)(i)(C), 29 CFR 2590.716-8(c)(3)(i)(C), and 45 CFR 149.510(c)(3)(i)(C), which established standards for determining when multiple items or services relate to “the treatment of a similar condition” for the purpose of batched disputes, the certified IDR entities may no longer rely on the regulatory guidance provided to assist certified IDR entities when reviewing batched disputes. Certified IDR entities must now rely upon only statutory language when determining whether multiple items or services are related to the treatment of a similar condition and are therefore appropriate to batch.